The Second Chance Act

The Second Chance Act

What is the Second Chance Act?

We have helped numerous inmates receive additional Residential Re-entry Center placement. Often times Home Confinement can occur during the placement. Call 214-431-2032  or email us at federalprisonauthoritybop@gmail.com for more information.
On April 28, 2008, the Second Chance Act of 2007, 18 U.S.C. § 3624. was signed into law to improve the outcomes for people returning to communities from prisons and jails. This legislation authorizes federal grants to government agencies and nonprofit organizations to provide programs and services to help reduce recidivism.

A. APPROPRIATIONS

  • In the fiscal year 2010, $144 million were appropriated for prisoner re-entry programs, including reentry initiatives in the Federal Bureau of Prisons and Second Chance grant programs:
  • Re-entry demonstration projects under Sec. 101
  • Mentoring grants to nonprofit organizations under Sec. 211
    Re-entry Courts under Sec. 111
  • Family-based, substance abuse treatment under Sec. 113
  • Grants to evaluate and improve education in prisons, jails, and juvenile facilities under Sec. 114
  • Technology career training demonstration grants under Sec. 115
  • Re-entry Substance Abuse and criminal justice collaboration under Sec. 201
  • Re-entry research under Sec. 245

B. PRE-RELEASE CUSTODY UNDER SEC. 251

This Act permits eligible inmates to spend some portion of the final twelve months of their sentence in a community correctional facility, also known as a halfway house or residential reentry center.

“The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall, to the extent practicable, ensure that a prisoner serving a term of imprisonment spends a portion of the final months of that term (not to exceed 12 months), under conditions that will afford that prisoner a reasonable opportunity to adjust to and prepare for the reentry of that prisoner into the community. Such conditions may include a community correctional facility.” Id. § 3624(c)(1).

This authority “may be used to place a prisoner in home confinement for the shorter of 10 percent of the term of imprisonment of that prisoner or 6 months.” Id. § 3624(c)(2).

It should be noted that § 3624 expressly does not override the BOP’s authority to designate an appropriate facility, thus a prisoner must meet the general eligibility requirements discussed above for these placements.

The regulation implementing this mandate provides that “[i]nmates may be designated to community confinement as a condition of pre-release custody and programming during the final months of the inmate’s term of imprisonment, not to exceed twelve months.” 28 C.F.R. § 570.21(a). This regulation also provides for “home detention as a condition of pre-release custody and programming during the final months of the inmate’s term of imprisonment, not to exceed the shorter of ten percent of the inmate’s term of imprisonment or six months.”

Pursuant to the Second Chance Act, the BOP staff is required to review inmates for RRC placement 17-19 months before their projected release date, and inmates are to be individually considered using the five factors listed in §3621(b).

C. ELDERLY INMATE PILOT PROGRAM UNDER SEC. 231

Pursuant to the Second Chance Act, the Attorney General was directed to conduct a pilot program to determine the effectiveness of removing eligible elderly offenders from a Bureau of Prisons facility and placing such offenders on home detention until their term of confinement has expired. 42 U.S.C. §17451(g)(1)(A). To be eligible for the Elderly Inmate Pilot Program, offenders must satisfy two sets of requirements in addition to the requirement that the offender must be not less than 65 years of age:

  1. The offender must be serving a term of imprisonment other than life imprisonment based on a conviction for an offense or offenses that do not include any crime of violence, sex offenses, or other offenses enumerated in the statute;
  2. the offender must have served a greater of 10 years or 75% of the term of imprisonment imposed at sentencing;
  3. the offender must not have been convicted in the past of any Federal or State crime of violence, sex offense, or other offense enumerated in the statute.
  4. the offender must not have been determined by the BOP to have a history of violence or of sex offenses or the other offenses described in the statute;
  5. the offender must not have escaped or attempted to escape from a BOP institution;
  6. the BOP must determine that release of the offender to home detention will result in a substantial net reduction of costs to the federal government; and
  7. the BOP must determine that the offender poses no substantial risk of engaging in criminal conduct or of endangering any person if released to home detention.

42 U.S.C. §17541(g)(5) (A)(I-vii).






    FREE CASE EVALUATION




      A good lawyer will help you minimize the damage of a bad situation

      The European languages are members of the same family. Their separate existence is a myth. For science, music, sport, etc, Europe uses the same vocabulary. The languages only differ in their grammar, their pronunciation and their most common words. Everyone realizes why a new common language would be desirable: one could refuse to pay expensive translators. To achieve this, it would be necessary to have uniform grammar, pronunciation and more common words. If several languages coalesce, the grammar of the resulting language is more simple and regular than that of the individual languages. The new common language will be

      About US
      Contact us right now

      No upfront fees.
      Pay only if you win.

      CreativoLaw is an intellectual proprety law languages are members of the same family. Their separate existence is a myth.

      The European languages are members of the same family. Their separate existence is a myth. For science, music, sport, etc, Europe uses the same vocabulary. The languages only differ in their grammar, their pronunciation and their most common words. Everyone realizes why a new common language would be desirable: one could refuse to pay expensive translators. To achieve this, it would be necessary to have uniform grammar, pronunciation and more common words. If several languages coalesce, the grammar of the resulting language is more simple and regular than that of the individual languages. The new common language will be